lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2564) Integrating grouping module into Solr 4.0
Date Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:23:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046091#comment-13046091
] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2564:
------------------------------------

bq. Another option is to allow the grouping module (separately from Lucene core) to use Java
6 code

+1

bq. Yonik, how do you create the index used for this test? Somehow you generate an int field
w/ random 1000 unique values – do you have a client-side script you use to create random
docs in Solr?

I have some CSV files laying around that I reuse for ad-hoc testing of a lot of stuff.  They
were created with a simple python script.
Then I simply index with
{code}
URL=http://localhost:8983/solr
curl "$URL/update/csv?stream.url=file:/tmp/test.csv&overwrite=false&commit=true"
{code}

It was also my first reaction to think that this is a very synthetic case that people are
unlikely to hit... until I thought about dates.  Indexing everything in date order is a pretty
common thing to do, and so is sorting by date - which hits the exact same case.  Queries of
*:* and simple filter queries on type, etc, also tend to be pretty common (i.e. full-text
relevance/performance actually isn't an important feature for some users).

How complex must queries be for caching to generate a net benefit under load? I haven't tried
to test this myself.

> Integrating grouping module into Solr 4.0
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2564
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Martijn van Groningen
>            Assignee: Martijn van Groningen
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch,
SOLR-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch
>
>
> Since work on grouping module is going well. I think it is time to wire this up in Solr.
> Besides the current grouping features Solr provides, Solr will then also support second
pass caching and total count based on groups.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message