Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A0B8498C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18305 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:42:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 18206 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:42:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 18138 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:42:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:42:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:42:25 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so3738969fxm.35 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:42:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2hdpCkLibbqfaBHXF7t0svxx2nShRHdeAFdO6jz5Wlo=; b=cOcZa/eV84xI4JS49/sAMNI25HziCFdh+iUOSGgQ2qX+IL0Yda2yRA7sNiwpST9s2Y ALiwBJwutX4iTQKF+Jw57J7a5JkI6FAwpDyIGNJrzEXwXaYb3ErRR34oks+W0mMQE/wZ 6dUPYCRQdgjBaimKUbhb5RshweM4bxPrLNNDc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LybN2fJgE2/82piRnXfoN9ikDZY4wQpWVybHzjWEjuAoksHBuZBgEmsalkBK3zdRJi wJSlnHL8hfIYJORepClzqlfxmS79CmUnuLDx3vvbLDSKxRuwgwgbCyTljyd4vEEKqPR4 j+m4qr7dbDU0tFxk1g7rD2iVrXbmSnow1KLsg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.85.196 with SMTP id p4mr1372833fal.105.1305841324443; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.112.12 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:42:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DD58C85.50103@yahoo.com> References: <4DD58C85.50103@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:42:04 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rOgjx22inmGr9yECkSixYzQZNmA Message-ID: Subject: Re: SolrCloud Distributed Indexing From: Yonik Seeley To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2011/5/19 Yury Kats : > I'm curious to know whether Distributed Indexing is on the roadmap for 4.0. > Looking at JIRA and past dev list discussions, there seem to have been > efforts around DI in the past, but no recent activity. > > Is this being worked on, postponed or deemed not important enough all together? Yes, some people have started some work on it, and it is very important, and I plan to start tackling it myself after Lucene Revolution. -Yonik http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May 25-26, San Francisco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org