Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cdoronc@gmail.com designates
 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=nZ6G2mOUk+aIm66VzGRnj6HTc/Yhc0f3pxlfO3Tc4MYeeqYvSPmhcGa6MN+0vaD1sc
         10RPuKzSYzHFxtbFrztxdzToz5Nz+On0PgM7gBq3YmSlGTIDvB2u7khzAewQGkXgr0MY
         cx1aY4voWZfcTC6a2GqFrCO0zlQNkX03pyGoE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FBAD42EE1@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu>
References: <BANLkTik+oE19mvCTkrrz5VYv9YnvPGkH_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1105171147380.12181@bester>
	<2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FBAD42EE1@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:00:11 +0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=CjM5EXHYu2MAPazboz8aQHX1rqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr JIRA
From: Doron Cohen <cdoronc@gmail.com>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64f47d613b3d404a3925647

--0016e64f47d613b3d404a3925647
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Steven A Rowe <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:

> On 5/17/2011 at 3:02 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> > If we were starting from scratch, i'd agree with you that having a single
> > Jira project makes more sense, but given where we are today, i think we
> > should probably keep them distinct -- partly from a "pain of migration"
> > standpoint on our end, but also from a user expecations standpoint -- i
> > think the Solr users/community as a whole is use to the existence of the
> > SOLR project in Jira, and use to the SOLR-* issue naming convention, and
> > it would likely be more confusing for *them* to change now.
>
> +1
>

+1 for keeping separate user lists and separate JIRA projects, stabilize, no
rush, release a few, then, perhaps, reiterate on this.

--0016e64f47d613b3d404a3925647
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:23 P=
M, Steven A Rowe <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sarowe@syr.edu">sa=
rowe@syr.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);=
 padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">On 5/17/2011 at 3:02 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:<br>
&gt; If we were starting from scratch, i&#39;d agree with you that having a=
 single<br>
&gt; Jira project makes more sense, but given where we are today, i think w=
e<br>
&gt; should probably keep them distinct -- partly from a &quot;pain of migr=
ation&quot;<br>
&gt; standpoint on our end, but also from a user expecations standpoint -- =
i<br>
&gt; think the Solr users/community as a whole is use to the existence of t=
he<br>
&gt; SOLR project in Jira, and use to the SOLR-* issue naming convention, a=
nd<br>
&gt; it would likely be more confusing for *them* to change now.<br>
<br>
</div>+1<br></blockquote><div><br>+1 for keeping separate user lists and se=
parate JIRA projects, stabilize, no rush, release a few, then, perhaps, rei=
terate on this.<br></div></div></div>

--0016e64f47d613b3d404a3925647--