Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EE0A4A87 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49743 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:35:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 49680 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 49673 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 11:35:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E546BCD133 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mark Harwood (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <967464006.18906.1305632087935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2454) Nested Document query support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034726#comment-13034726 ] Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-2454: -------------------------------------- bq. I think this is the only core change necessary for this feature? Yup. A same-segment indexing guarantee is all that is required. > Nested Document query support > ----------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2454 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: core/search > Affects Versions: 3.0.2 > Reporter: Mark Harwood > Assignee: Mark Harwood > Priority: Minor > Attachments: LuceneNestedDocumentSupport.zip > > > A facility for querying nested documents in a Lucene index as outlined in http://www.slideshare.net/MarkHarwood/proposal-for-nested-document-support-in-lucene -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org