lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Willnauer <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.2.0
Date Fri, 27 May 2011 17:32:33 GMT
I think robert is right here. We want to do more frequent releases and
to go that path we need to stop waiting for a week for feature /
improvement X. We can spin another release in 4 weeks I think we
should actually. If we do that and increment the version number by 1
each time we reach 3.9 by the end of the year, just ready for 4.0 :)

here is my +1

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Robert Muir <> wrote:
>> True. Only thought that we might want to give people time to ensure that
>> things that are important to them are included in 3.2.
> Why? if these issues are so critical they should be marked as blockers!
> Again, why wait a week, we could release again in a week instead!
> This whole lifecycle is broken:
> 1. hey everyone, lets release in X days.
> 2. people rush in all their favorite pet features, maybe in sloppy
> fashion since they really want to get them in, which destabilizes the
> code.
> 3. we generate RC after RC because in each one someone finds a new
> bug... there are always bugs and if 3.2 doesnt introduce the bug, i
> dont think it should block it... 3.2 fixes some bugs and we can fix
> more bugs in 3.3
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message