lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Miller (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2995) factor out a shared spellchecking module
Date Mon, 23 May 2011 20:37:48 GMT


Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2995:

{quote}Or rather than revert... just iterate it forward until it satisfies
everybody's concerns. Why keep moving backwards?{quote}

+1. Reverting itself should not feel wrong - asking others to revert should IMO. The default
mode should be moving forward, not backward. Everything is open to change and improvement
- asking for a revert from someone else will always be considered a very big deal by me. Unless
it's a special circumstance I'm going to rant and rave about it every time myself. 

> factor out a shared spellchecking module
> ----------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2995
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2995-diff.patch, LUCENE-2995.patch, LUCENE-2995.patch
> In lucene's contrib we have spellchecking support (index-based spellchecker, directspellchecker,
> we also have some things like pluggable comparators.
> In solr we have auto-suggest support (with two implementations it looks like), some good
utilities like HighFrequencyDictionary, etc.
> I think spellchecking is really important... google has upped the ante to what users
> So I propose we combine all this stuff into a shared modules/spellchecker, which will
make it easier
> to refactor and improve the quality.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message