lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:57:25 GMT
Thanks !

Shai

On Friday, April 1, 2011, Steven A Rowe <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:
> Shai, the source jars are available from the maven central repo, e.g.:
>
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/3.1.0/lucene-core-3.1.0-sources.jar
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shai Erera [mailto:serera@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:12 AM
>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml
>>
>> Ok, we can keep SNAPSHOT. I was just thinking it'll be nice if the tag
>> sets the right version, for convenience. It's not so hard to do.
>>
>> BTW, I don't build the code, just run jar-src so I can attach the
>> source to the jars for debugging purposes. If we had packaged them
>> already (not that I propose that we do that), I wouldn't be
>> downloading the source at all.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shai
>>
>> On Friday, April 1, 2011, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>> > +1.
>> >
>> > In all previous releases we were leaving the -dev in the common-
>> build.xml, it's simply now -SNAPSHOT. Whenever somebody compiles the code
>> himself, there might be changes in it so the reproduced JAR files are not
>> identical to the released ones.
>> >
>> > This was the same for all releases before (at least since 2.9.0 where we
>> had the discussion, too).
>> >
>> > Uwe
>> >
>> > -----
>> > Uwe Schindler
>> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> > http://www.thetaphi.de
>> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sarowe@syr.edu]
>> >> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:19 PM
>> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> >> Subject: RE: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml
>> >>
>> >> Hi Shai,
>> >>
>> >> On 4/1/2011 at 8:32 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
>> >> > Also, the common-build.xml under the tag and the downloaded sources
>> >> > specifies version to be 3.1-SNAPSHOT. On the ReleaseTodo I found
>> >> > this: "... and the default version in lucene/common-build.xml on the
>> >> > branch to X.Y (remove the -SNAPSHOT suffix)", so I guess 'SNAPSHOT'
>> >> > should have been removed, but also version should be set to 3.1.0.
>> >>
>> >> I'm pretty sure the ReleaseTodo page is wrong on this.
>> >>
>> >> Building from a source distribution should *not* produce artifacts that
>> have
>> >> the same version in their names as the binary release.  We don't want
>> same-
>> >> version-but-different binary artifacts being accidentally
>> produced.  There's
>> >> nothing stopping people from changing this themselves, of course, so
>> leaving
>> >> the pre-release version name, including the "-SNAPSHOT" suffix, in the
>> >> source release is just a passive defense against this kind of mistake.
>> >>
>> >> I'll change the ReleaseTodo page if there are no objections.
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message