lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3024) If index has more than Integer.MAX_VALUE terms, seeking can it AIOOBE due to long/int overflow
Date Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:38:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13019003#comment-13019003
] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3024:
--------------------------------------------

Fixed in 3.2, 4.0.

I'm leaving this open in case we ever release 3.1.1.

> If index has more than Integer.MAX_VALUE terms, seeking can it AIOOBE due to long/int
overflow
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3024
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3024
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 3.1.1, 3.2, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3024.patch
>
>
> Tom hit a new long/int overflow case: http://markmail.org/thread/toyl2ujcl4suqvf3
> This is a regression, in 3.1, introduced with LUCENE-2075.
> Worse, our Test2BTerms failed to catch this, so I've fixed that test to show the failure.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message