lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5 on branch_3x
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:19:23 GMT
/me is unhappy, too. By the way, we use Java 5 also in Lucene trunk!

In most cases such Javadoc bugs can be circumvented by using absolute class names.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sarowe@syr.edu]
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 3:54 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK
> 1.5 on branch_3x
> 
> Turns out that the problem is that ReusableAnalyzerBase is not in the same
> package in branch_3x as on trunk, so the class reference is just wrong on
> branch_3x, regardless of the JDK one uses to generate javadocs.  (Oracle
> 1.6.0_21 JDK triggers the same failure on branch_3x.)
> 
> Robert, I trust you will see your way clear to fixing this, regardless of your lack
> of interest in supporting Oracle's buggy implementations.
> 
> But I still think the issue should be resolved: Robert thinks he doesn't have to
> play by the rules (JDK 1.5 support for Lucene, javadocs warnings fail the build,
> failed builds are not allowed), and I think that's unacceptable.  I think the
> proper course of action is calling a vote to change the rules, not just blithely
> ignoring them because you don't feel like following them.
> 
> Unhappily,
> Steve
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DM Smith [mailto:dmsmith555@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 9:31 AM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle
> > JDK
> > 1.5 on branch_3x
> >
> > What is the bug? I have an interest in this component and am willing
> > to see about fixing it. It appears that it is a Javadoc bug??? Why
> > would we keep good code out for that?
> >
> > -- DM
> >
> > On 04/15/2011 09:15 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> > > As a result of Robert Muir's r1092398 commit on branch_3x (the
> > > Latvian
> > analysis stuff), the build is now broken under Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5:
> > >
> > >    [javadoc]
> >
> C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\contrib\analyzers\common
> \s
> > rc\
> > java\org\apache\lucene\analysis\lv\LatvianAnalyzer.java:118: warning -
> > Tag @link: reference not found:
> >
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.ReusableAnalyzerBase.TokenStreamCompon
> > ent
> > s
> > > [...]
> > >    [javadoc] 5 warnings
> > >
> > > BUILD FAILED
> > > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\build.xml:217: The
> > following error occurred while executing this line:
> > > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\common-build.xml:813:
> > Javadocs warnings were found!
> > >
> > > Robert said on #lucene IRC:
> > >> (9:02:53 AM) rmuir: its a bug in the EOL'ed java5
> > >> (9:02:57 AM) rmuir: im not fixing it
> > >> (9:03:21 AM) rmuir: build isnt broken
> > >> (9:04:07 AM) rmuir: jre bug = not my problem
> > >> (9:04:32 AM) rmuir: complain to oracle, having hit another one of
> > their bugs at 3am last night, ive had it with their crap
> > >> (9:04:42 AM) rmuir: i didnt break the build
> > >> (9:04:43 AM) rmuir: its a bug in your jre
> > > Needless to say, I disagree vehemently with Robert.
> > >
> > > I think Robert should fix this or his commit should be reverted.
> > >
> > > I'm interested in hearing other opinions on this.
> > >
> > > Steve


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message