Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41234 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 02:07:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 02:07:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 81826 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 02:07:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 81767 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 02:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 81760 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 02:07:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:07:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:07:30 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so3115863qwj.35 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:07:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=Feg9PoUJ3K/DD7/EkZT7HLtq5aS6H1aWuKMBvzNplgU=; b=hQnnY66CWW1FvHdVFScecwsibdssnA+n7m0IzfMzagAqrsxFQIl0L9rmSZdBDrRe94 qQXPZRHC7SPU6566jHJ8+mcpY5Wcx6OeaNy8CqZnve4U2NW3shEXl2PKSL2GimK53Ngc 0swLdoA0fes+0Xc918JCNCjSnCFhuma58CjHE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=gPY93srkaYDPc0nTVA0k13HeveKdw+yFIJjNwbTL8Z8ViXZ7CyDuUGR9glX9P+6DSU 1/RvhuOavsnV1++GGaIDjon2LMUXdpI/jwktVJ6IsOf4JW51uvpvg/wa8GPbgQXDBcoH uEAscCJsNrejsfmggDrlhMFohW/poomI5ehrg= Received: by 10.224.213.193 with SMTP id gx1mr460088qab.44.1300414029435; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.201] (ool-44c63c22.dyn.optonline.net [68.198.60.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm1918541qco.47.2011.03.17.19.07.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Lucene Solr 3.1 RC1 From: Mark Miller In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:07:05 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: dev@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 17, 2011, at 9:45 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: >=20 > by thta same rationale, we don't need to include javadocs in any = release,=20 > because you could always find them online (and if i wanted to be = snarky:=20 > you could always go find the java source itself online too) I'm tempted to +1 both those things. But okay - lets distrib all this = crap and provide it online as well - and lets dance and juggle to get = one form to the other - but please, oh please, can we stop distributing = the website in the release. Including the PDF's of the website. This is = a pain in the ass to have to update and then include in the release as = an RM - it's not worth its weight IMO. Disengage from Forrest ... = disengage.... - mark= --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org