lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan McKinley <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.1
Date Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:40:40 GMT
> I don't think someone should have to deal with maven to get the lucene
> source release... I think lucene should have its own artifacts as in
> the past (the source code being the most important).

sorry, did not mean to muddy the water with maven discussion...
ignore my comment

when you say "lucene should have its own artifacts" do you mean lucene
w/o solr?  or could a single source artifact include everything?
(making the release process easier and apparently cleaner)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message