lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.1
Date Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:53:00 GMT
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't want to suggest anything to slow down the release... but if
> the problems are with the source release, what about just doing a
> single source release for lucene+solr?
>
> We currently have:
>
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/lucene-3.1.0-src.tar.gz
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/...
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/apache-solr-3.1.0-src.tgz
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/...
>
> Why not:
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene-3.1.0-src.tar.gz
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/...
> lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/...
>
> and let the src release be as close to svn export as possible?  This
> will make sure the result builds just as it does when we actually
> build it!
>
> With the maven artifacts, we have source for each jar:
> http://people.apache.org/~yonik/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.1RC2/solr/maven/org/apache/solr/solr-core/3.1.0/solr-core-3.1.0-sources.jar
>
> http://people.apache.org/~yonik/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.1RC2/lucene/maven/org/apache/lucene/lucene-queries/3.1.0/lucene-queries-3.1.0-sources.jar
>
> I'm not sure the exact ASF source requirements, but maybe the maven
> source.jar files are good enough?
>

I don't think someone should have to deal with maven to get the lucene
source release... I think lucene should have its own artifacts as in
the past (the source code being the most important).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message