Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66360 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2011 23:43:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2011 23:43:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 72742 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2011 23:43:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 72645 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2011 23:43:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 72638 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2011 23:43:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:43:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:43:23 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2311737bwz.35 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:43:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=9abpIppr8cVw6i7Bfmql6PbKn04R2ujpznf77sM4mWs=; b=wSRLeN/boUMFYP/njcc/57PyF6Q1TlK8dcVUNTEYHvTIhdY6Kup5gEvsa2VAZTOcWv VUmhC0hWDYk8obq3nmnQu6GqrXMWV2X/wjorVcOYhz9ikroFDdBVxgrPywjJvbp2+SFl nX44nyRRNOrmt/+1bc1ZLD1rKJtq8afKaKU3A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=k48j41bz1UiER4CxyPUy+wbpKu52vcFQ3HwDk6hPZxSOJrT+YuIMGLKuyG3k/hSwJh PpBDzl7pvrDeQbVvNkJxCWbcn/Z/m3TPvp8+Lc8W6ETYJ1MfDYPt6+O9FZslSTvUxPa+ JmieEAfzxB2UYRuSR+zJDdupSMv/edVjw7Tsg= Received: by 10.204.62.209 with SMTP id y17mr10416248bkh.98.1296776581312; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:43:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.101.5 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:42:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Muir Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:42:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wind down for 3.1? To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base > : in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus > : on bugs and tests only in branch_3x and try to shorten, not length the > : list of issues in JIRA (unless these issues are bugs!). > > +1 > > Looking over the open issues for 3.1, the one "new feature" issue that > jumps out at as potentially being problematic (and not easy to push back > if it's not done by the casual freeze date) is SOLR-1553 - the "edismax" > handler. > > The initial patch has been committed for a long while (since before the > dev merge) but it has a bunch of little of problems that impact the "user > api" (ie: what some of the syntax means (ie: should ":" be escaped if it's > not used on a known field), and wether certain behavior should be on by > default or not once new params are added (ie: a new "uf" param) which is > the main reason it's been left open all this time. Ah i see, its just confusing since its not in 'reopened' or 'bug' status, but these sound like things that should be resolved in some way (even if thats experimental as you said) before the release. I won't touch this one. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org