Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88643 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2011 22:34:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2011 22:34:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 48627 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 22:34:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48431 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 22:34:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48424 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2011 22:34:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:34:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:34:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D18425AF for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:34:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Muir (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <790040602.3286.1298932477000.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1327055274.2803.1298925817275.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2943) ICU collator thread-safety issues MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2943: -------------------------------- Attachment: LUCENE-2943.patch Updated patch: I clone the JDK ones too. Its not really the case that these are "thread-safe", instead really what happens is their methods are synced (if they are correct). So its good to clone to reduce contention. Also i took a look at harmony, which simply wraps the ICU impl and doesn't sync, which means its not thread safe (but should be). For these reasons I think we should just clone the JDK one for safety too. > ICU collator thread-safety issues > --------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2943 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2943 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Analysis > Reporter: Robert Muir > Fix For: 3.1, 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2943.patch, LUCENE-2943.patch > > > The ICU Collators (unlike the JDK ones) aren't thread safe: http://userguide.icu-project.org/collation/architecture , a little non-obvious since its not mentioned > in the javadocs, and its not clear if the docs apply to only the C code, but i looked > at the source and there is all kinds of internal state. > So in my opinion, we should clone the icu collators (which are passed in from the outside) > when creating a new TokenStream/AttributeImpl to prevent problems. This shouldn't be a big > deal since everything uses reusableTokenStream anyway. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org