Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8875 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 18:20:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 18:20:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 95147 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 18:20:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95045 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 18:20:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95034 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 18:20:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:20:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:20:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7971A6C90 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:19:57 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mark Miller (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <177731373.18187.1297793997440.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-2105) RequestHandler param update.processor is confusing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2105?page=3Dcom.atlassian.= jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D12994= 914#comment-12994914 ]=20 Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2105: ----------------------------------- I like this change. Can you leave update.processor in but deprecated? Perhaps print log warning= if it's detected. Then we could make a hard change in 4.X perhaps? > RequestHandler param update.processor is confusing > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-2105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2105 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: update > Affects Versions: 1.4.1 > Reporter: Jan H=C3=B8ydahl > Priority: Minor > Attachments: SOLR-2105.patch > > > Today we reference a custom updateRequestProcessorChain using the update = request parameter "update.processor". > See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#UpdateRequestProcessorChain= _section > This is confusing, since what we are really referencing is not an UpdateP= rocessor, but an updateRequestProcessorChain. > I propose that "update.processor" is renamed as "update.chain" or similar --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org