Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89858 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 22:38:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 22:38:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 76199 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 22:38:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76110 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 22:38:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76103 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2011 22:38:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:38:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:38:45 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1641A94AA for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:38:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "David Smiley (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1006021675.1199.1297895904517.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1553) extended dismax query parser MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995555#comment-12995555 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-1553: ------------------------------------ I'm confused about why this cool query parser I've been using is "experimental". Sure, there are opportunities for improvement, but it's already better than the original dismax which this makes obsolete. No? > extended dismax query parser > ---------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-1553 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Yonik Seeley > Assignee: Yonik Seeley > Fix For: 3.1 > > Attachments: SOLR-1553.patch, SOLR-1553.pf-refactor.patch, edismax.unescapedcolon.bug.test.patch, edismax.unescapedcolon.bug.test.patch, edismax.userFields.patch > > > An improved user-facing query parser based on dismax -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org