On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Michael Busch <buschmic@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/27/11 2:47 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Michael Busch<buschmic@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, after LUCENE-2881 assigning the same fieldNumber to the same
>>> fieldName
>>> across segments is best effort - not guaranteed anymore. It looks like
>>> in
>>> most cases it works fine, just very rarely we get different field
>>> numbers.
>>> I don't see how we can improve the best effort, because I don't think we
>>> can assign field numbers on flush (like codecIDs)?
>>
>> Can you elaborate this? I am not sure if I understand what you mean here!
>>
>
> Sorry should have explained this better. I actually posted a comment
> describing what I meant with "best effort" on LUCENE-2881, so that it's
> easier to find in the future.
Thanks michael, now this failure makes way more sense to me....
simon
>
> Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
|