lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steven Rowe (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2923) cleanup contrib/demo
Date Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:45:42 GMT


Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2923:

    Attachment: LUCENE-2923.patch

This patch adds the following (and includes all of Mike's patch):

* IntelliJ IDEA configuration adjustments
* Maven POM adjustments
* Source and regenerated site docs
* {{contrib/demo/build.xml}} builds the Lucene core jar in the {{init}} target if it doesn't
exist or if its {{.java}} source files are newer than the jar.
* {{contrib/demo/build.xml}} default target is now {{jar-core}}
* At Mike's suggestion on #lucene IRC, added javadoc comment to IndexFiles pointing out that
1 input doc per file is slow, and that good throughput can be gained by putting multiple docs
in a single input file.
* Other minor cleanups

Committing shortly.

> cleanup contrib/demo
> --------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2923
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Steven Rowe
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2923.patch, LUCENE-2923.patch, LUCENE-2923.patch, LUCENE-2923.patch
> I don't think we should include optimize in the demo; many people start from the demo
and may think you must optimize to do searching, and that's clearly not the case.
> I think we should also use a buffered reader in FileDocument?
> And... I'm tempted to remove IndexHTML (and the html parser) entirely.  It's ancient,
and we now have Tika to extract text from many doc formats.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message