lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: wind down for 3.1?
Date Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:18:42 GMT
+1 to the bigger idea and +1 to releasing both at the same time.  


On Feb 3, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Robert Muir wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or
>> both?
> 
> Both: because our development is merged, I think it makes sense to
> merge release engineering too.
> 
> The users can be mostly unaware of this: for example the generated
> artifacts are separate and posted on different websites.
> But I think we should branch/tag/generate RC's and releases
> together... I actually would propose we even have a single vote thread
> for the combined releases.
> I think this will result in higher quality releases because the 'whole
> thing' is what is tested by hudson etc, not solr with an older copy of
> lucene jar files.
> 
> This is just my idea, if you are nervous about this speak up, we could
> alternatively create two separate release branches (one for lucene,
> one for solr) but I would really like to avoid this.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message