lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2892) Add QueryParser.newFieldQuery
Date Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:36:57 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992759#comment-12992759
] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2892:
-------------------------------------

I think this is an easy win for some common use cases from the API perspective.

If no one objects i'll commit in a few days.

> Add QueryParser.newFieldQuery
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2892
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2892
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: QueryParser
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2892.patch
>
>
> Note: this patch changes no behavior, just makes QP more subclassable.
> Currently we have Query getFieldQuery(String field, String queryText, boolean quoted)
> This contains very hairy methods for producing a query from QP's analyzer.
> I propose we factor this into newFieldQuery(Analyzer analyzer, String field, String queryText,
boolean quoted)
> Then getFieldQuery just calls newFieldQuery(this.analyzer, field, queryText, quoted);
> The reasoning is: it can be quite useful to consider the double quote as more than phrases,
but a "more exact" search.
> In the case the user quoted the terms, you might want to analyze the text with an alternate
analyzer that:
> doesn't produce synonyms, doesnt decompose compounds, doesn't use WordDelimiterFilter

> (you would need to be using preserveOriginal=true at index time for the WDF one), etc
etc.
> This is similar to the way google's double quote operator works, its not defined as phrase
but "this exact wording or phrase".
> For example compare results to a query of tests versus "tests".
> Currently you can do this without heavy code duplication, but really only if you make
a separate field (which is wasteful),
> and make your custom QP lie about its field... in the examples I listed above you can
do this with a single field, yet still
> have a more exact phrase search.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message