Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11403 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 20:56:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 20:56:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 2198 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 20:56:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1977 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 20:56:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1970 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 20:56:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:56:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:56:12 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so6088346fxm.35 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:55:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yCIpsaRGA4136f0FxK0W8tSiC+Ws+K//uI5AUpti6Q0=; b=gh33qNHPWfEDKlB6t7+QdyuBlpRO6BmBM3HMzZLToMW2eMOJDFiJxd9PikdCWYd5fH e5J+7PWwrax1F8NyIkEsTvInVxgqiqGXhEoJ8By9DYpciDHtCGwKo00q6to0Ilw3Aol3 OQI1D9AD8OZIElqPImLF94GcBUSLRW48Hn5vo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FXKBX8fAHqa2BI22My0y2CUIK5h+c7JTZW334eQR7Gh7A895pJqEkIZ0o+BNoYclR3 eIL2dB/gEtCiDshHh0r0+T91QopwAphFoBnge8eBDe+Ox6QG1qNSCYCMolz5lHR9dbdS s/IxxJ6IVa/LNn3sa9JqmBiOUF72LG8JKFdsY= Received: by 10.223.122.16 with SMTP id j16mr445088far.133.1291236950058; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:55:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.93.135 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:55:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1B9DCC29-7901-46DC-BD12-D9E6ECBD42AA@apache.org> From: Robert Muir Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:55:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Document aware analyzers was Re: deprecating Versions To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote= : >> Well i have trouble with a few of your examples: "want to use >> Tee/Sink" doesn't work for me... its a description of an XY problem to >> me... i've never needed to use it, and its rarely discussed on the >> user list... > > Shrugs. =C2=A0In my experiments, it can really speed things up when analy= zing the same content, but with different outcomes, or at least it did back= before the new API. > For instance, the typical copy field scenario where one has two fields co= ntaining the same content analyzed in slightly different ways. =C2=A0In man= y cases, most of the work is exactly the same (tokenize, lowercase, stopwor= d, stem or not) and yet we have to pass around the string twice and do almo= st all of the same work twice all so that we can change one little thing on= the token. > but didnt you just answer your own question? sounds like you just need to implement copyField in solr with Tee/Sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org