Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86854 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 19:14:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 19:14:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 78466 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 19:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 78407 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 19:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 78399 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 19:14:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:14:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aserba@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:14:39 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so541952qwh.35 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:14:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RJSm7jeEezvb58mQoHmLJt0HpkR6QRDee2m3g7X0YD0=; b=aZLV/6dDx5kqkTtcjLQ9PSh3ghh4BQgBISs87W7tDag+9jaVCuO+GwULA8GuexsUAg exXqA6VBiK20NoeLEReIyFCpDZW1P4HljA7VJddzvxmdI9gC6MvDOyUr2+9Tkwn0qJbV JdGJkfb3kK/5WuNBWgjM/kBSm5qhmyZg5avCU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Il9JtrLRy1i7or2+Eiuwo1uLHe5M8HRMXKMdNbBwcR1U5RBUQenpfi3aK7umWby63C JbijLss8TzegfQDE2d8zgAX4yviOUlhp/k6kJOHwbHCs/z2z8Bhm6taOOhYjC1dfwmTO 7ChjXADzJRDGft6XcH/ZuReCePlKC35lFFh8k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.221.69 with SMTP id ib5mr4867597qcb.10.1291662858563; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:14:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.248.202 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:14:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:14:18 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DataImportHandlerException when cache key is null in SOLR 1.4.1 From: Alexey Serba To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I think it should be logged, but adding an exception is an overkill because > the whole SolrInputDocument is rejected. Makes sense. Could you please file a ticket and attach a patch to it? It would be great to have single (not one per doc/row) warning message, otherwise with a big result set with nulls it would pollute the logs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org