On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> Well i have trouble with a few of your examples: "want to use >> Tee/Sink" doesn't work for me... its a description of an XY problem to >> me... i've never needed to use it, and its rarely discussed on the >> user list... > > Shrugs.  In my experiments, it can really speed things up when analyzing the same content, but with different outcomes, or at least it did back before the new API. > For instance, the typical copy field scenario where one has two fields containing the same content analyzed in slightly different ways.  In many cases, most of the work is exactly the same (tokenize, lowercase, stopword, stem or not) and yet we have to pass around the string twice and do almost all of the same work twice all so that we can change one little thing on the token. > but didnt you just answer your own question? sounds like you just need to implement copyField in solr with Tee/Sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org