lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Changes Mess
Date Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:13:18 GMT

On Dec 8, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> 	***
> 
> ...my vote is to start having CHANGES.txt focus solely on the changes 
> commited to the branches that lead to that release (so 4.1.1's CHANGES.txt 
> will list 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, and 4.2.1 - but not 3.1, or 4.1.1) but i could 
> also be pursuaded that it should only be that exact release (4.1.1 only 
> contains commits specific to 4.1.1)
> 
> I think that general approach is the only sane thing to do (both from a 
> developer sanity stand point, and from a clarity to users standpoint 
> about what versions on what branches contain what bug fixes/features) now 
> that we are knowingly and deliberately maintaining multiple branches under 
> active development.
> 

Makes sense to me.  History is easily obtained from other places and people will likely have
the context of older changes already.

-Grant


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message