lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Elschot (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation
Date Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:28:04 GMT


Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410:

I'm running into a nocommit for the nio byte buffer allocation in
Shall I try and move the buffer handling from there into FORIndexInput and PForDeltaIndexInput
at the codecs?
I could leave it as it is, but then the test cases from the 1410e patch would have to be adapted
again when the nocommit is fixed.

Also the package/directory naming o.a.l.util.pfor and o.a.l.index.codecs.pfordelta may be
Probably pfordelta could could be renamed to pfor, since delta refers to differences (in docids
and positions) that are treated elsewhere.
But I'd rather not change that now. 

> PFOR implementation
> -------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-1410
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Paul Elschot
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Bulk Postings branch
>         Attachments: autogen.tgz, for-summary.txt, LUCENE-1410-codecs.tar.bz2, LUCENE-1410.patch,
LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410b.patch, LUCENE-1410c.patch,
LUCENE-1410d.patch, LUCENE-1410e.patch, TermQueryTests.tgz,,,
>   Original Estimate: 21840h
>  Remaining Estimate: 21840h
> Implementation of Patched Frame of Reference.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message