Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=Sk12NuyBDGyfIsisHw7/OZPMQxLTNph7pN5NKB55m8sERg7lORcAMdJB2DiPa98/rP
         3iiHOCEs8SLqLYO321cQe+jbCKeD4MY13ZdTXuWtcBLSXDZXhf1RJx2DLmFWGQhgI6eI
         Xx75sHDQl2d7b9TDGUY8wbSdfBWZCFAKZo6yY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinoNeSvK6r-3FcTRhWGw5GyUUvEfC8DuY706qKS@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=71Mio=aifW6uACt7iq+6ppwyNzZrcirRNBs+E@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimYrV8rh-aMhG_rNQLrdS2h--MRKsGj9bxfBN8Y@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTim0wGVOSVF58vJ72_b6MHQLfCQ=VLocX8_54W8D@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTinoNeSvK6r-3FcTRhWGw5GyUUvEfC8DuY706qKS@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:16:00 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTimMABOaF5K_ROMr=sL2M4C50je1kaO5pS0zYLpH@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DirectSolrSpellCheckerTest failure
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Shai, now that I think the test reproducibility issue is resolved, i
need to pressure this test to reproduce your problem.
Can you tell me the IBM JDK version / OS version you used (I will use
IBM JDK, just in case its specific to that one)?

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hmm .. I previously ran the test w/ IBM's JDK (6) and after seeing your
>> mail, I tried w/ Oracle's (6) -- to my surprise the latter succeeds.
>>
>> What happens in the test that the JDK version can affect?
>>
>
> After testing, It seems to be an issue only with solr tests.
>
> When solr indexes, it seems the order of the fields being indexed is
> not well-defined. Perhaps they are using some iterator with undefined
> order to iterate over the fields.
>
> I didnt mess with this, instead i changed RandomCodecProvider to be
> insensitive to the order of fields being added.
> In other words, say you have "fieldA" and "fieldB".
> If RandomCodecProvider wants to assign "Pulsing" to fieldA, and
> "Standard" to fieldB, this will always happen, regardless of whether
> you add fieldA before fieldB, or vice versa.
>
> Now i get the same codec mapping for solr tests with the same seed,
> across different jvms...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org