Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36354 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 10:35:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 10:35:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 2057 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 10:35:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1758 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 10:35:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 1751 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 10:35:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:35:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:35:08 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so4207902bwz.35 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:34:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5uVyS63J0U7YwIAhp1JHFA+QYQ2l74Y70EXaWBd181Q=; b=X+sz8vrFArkNELfg4I0Fe9iuB2nzbGayyVAZh6I5ug+Os/+QIhVs2MuwFXuGClmePp wyHR5luAIvraj6ZOFvxOaXM9C/fG2elLc7zsgD5DC4ABuEmkmQBQjrRxbbpCqq9iERNY PJOZK8dVdRyUMaYOHFD6ekk1O0G/i4fmor+TU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZLjAV3GDYPNKA+W+4aVXKJd/sZRk5I96TZK+Y0+Gqu7pJyp+QrXt0sWkL9qxx8GLuu jdJVVCUSt0j7YvweiB6K8VdXkJ9iU9E3D4chAvNNgSNfvU+kr9KxG5DEA13b9nUMfsgx 2t2qVUtI45NVppR8AY0zh8tBDoZXWTr7DYD9s= Received: by 10.204.68.142 with SMTP id v14mr4629310bki.106.1291026887916; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:34:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.77.201 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 02:34:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Muir Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:34:27 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: deprecating Versions To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote: > And for indexes: > * Index compatibility is guaranteed across two adjacent major > releases. eg 2.x -> 3.x, 3.x -> 4.x. > =C2=A0That includes both binary compat - codecs, and semantic compat - > analyzers (if appropriate Version is used). > * Older releases are most probably unsupported. > =C2=A0e.g. 4.x still supports shared docstores for reading, though never > writes them. 5.x won't read them either, so you'll have to at least > fully optimize your 3.x indexes when going through 4.x to 5.x. > Is it somehow possible i could convince everyone that all the analyzers we provide are simply examples? This way we could really make this a bit more reasonable and clean up a lot of stuff. Seems like we really want to move towards a more declarative model where these are just config files... so only then it will ok for us to change them because they suddenly aren't suffixed with .java?! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org