Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67448 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 03:02:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 03:02:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 59068 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 03:03:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58877 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 03:03:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58870 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 03:03:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 03:03:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 03:03:03 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA532glE027817 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 03:02:42 GMT Message-ID: <33183867.22061288926162059.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:02:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Lance Norskog (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-2218) Performance of start= and rows= parameters are exponentially slow with large data sets In-Reply-To: <9618504.211361288751186159.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12928457#action_12928457 ] Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-2218: ------------------------------------- There is a workaround for this called _docid_. http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/?q=_docid_#/p:solr > Performance of start= and rows= parameters are exponentially slow with large data sets > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-2218 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2218 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Build > Affects Versions: 1.4.1 > Reporter: Bill Bell > > With large data sets, > 10M rows. > Setting start= and rows= is slow, and gets slower the farther you get from start=0 with a complex query. Random also makes this slower. > Would like to somehow make this performance faster for looping through large data sets. It would be nice if we could pass a pointer to the result set to loop, or support very large rows=. > Something like: > rows=1000 > start=0 > spointer=string_my_query_1 > Then within interval (like 5 mins) I can reference this loop: > Something like: > rows=1000 > start=1000 > spointer=string_my_query_1 > What do you think? Since the data is too great the cache is not helping. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org