Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82308 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 22:10:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 22:10:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 60215 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:10:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 60058 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:10:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 60050 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 22:10:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:10:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:10:32 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oATMAAps011616 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:10:11 GMT Message-ID: <24919598.11451291068610755.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:10:10 -0500 (EST) From: "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-2779) Use ConcurrentHashMap in RAMDirectory In-Reply-To: <10750696.314731290706214515.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-2779: ----------------------------------- This commit broke backwards compatibility in 3.x. Please revert 3.x, we are no longer backwards compatible, because we changed type of a *protected* field! (and: is it so complicated to do *ant test-backwards* before committing such a change?) > Use ConcurrentHashMap in RAMDirectory > ------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2779 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Store > Reporter: Shai Erera > Assignee: Shai Erera > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.1, 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2779.patch, LUCENE-2779.patch, TestCHM.java > > > RAMDirectory synchronizes on its instance in many places to protect access to map of RAMFiles, in addition to updating the sizeInBytes member. In many places the sync is done for 'read' purposes, while only in few places we need 'write' access. This looks like a perfect use case for ConcurrentHashMap > Also, syncing around sizeInBytes is unnecessary IMO, since it's an AtomicLong ... > I'll post a patch shortly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org