Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75786 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 22:20:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 22:20:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 58933 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 22:20:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58883 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 22:20:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58876 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 22:20:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:20:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:20:32 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAUMKCXZ023092 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:20:12 GMT Message-ID: <15004611.36371291155612124.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:20:12 -0500 (EST) From: "Chris Male (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2139) Cleanup and Improvement of Spatial Contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965458#action_12965458 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139: ------------------------------------ Nicolas, Its true that Solr does not support spatial tier search but this was due to the code in spatial lucene being so buggy. I think everybody is happy to revisit the issue and add spatial tier support to Solr if we can come up with a clear, test and bug-free underlying implementation. I think whatever work we do we should do in a spatial module. Simon, Perhaps we should @deprecate the contrib in 3x, nuke in 4x and start up the module? > Cleanup and Improvement of Spatial Contrib > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-2139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/spatial > Affects Versions: 3.1 > Reporter: Chris Male > Assignee: Simon Willnauer > Attachments: LUCENE-2139-Java5Only.patch, LUCENE-2139-svnScript.sh, LUCENE-2139.patch > > > The current spatial contrib can be improved by adding documentation, tests, removing unused classes and code, repackaging the classes and improving the performance of the distance filtering. The latter will incorporate the multi-threaded functionality introduced in LUCENE-1732. > Other improvements involve adding better support for different distance units, different distance calculators and different data formats (whether it be lat/long fields, geohashes, or something else in the future). > Patch to be added soon. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org