lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2694) MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass
Date Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:50:16 GMT


Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2694:

Uwe I agree with your comments - I just didn't pay lots of attention to it since I was rather
interested in feedback for the idea....

I actually think that we should move the getTermState into the termsEnum though rather than
using an attribute but for now that was easier to implement though.

bq. What happens in the term collectors when the same term with different states are merged
in the PQ/TermsHash/...?
That one should work since I map the TermState per reader in a PerReaderTermState though.


> MTQ rewrite + weight/scorer init should be single pass
> ------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2694
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2694.patch
> Spinoff of LUCENE-2690 (see the hacked patch on that issue)...
> Once we fix MTQ rewrite to be per-segment, we should take it further and make weight/scorer
init also run in the same single pass as rewrite.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message