Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97237 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 15:41:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 15:41:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 4985 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 15:41:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4926 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 15:41:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4919 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 15:41:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:41:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of earwin@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:41:15 +0000 Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so5307372iwn.35 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:40:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PxZlx5VZpLXTJ/j8EJ6l6GPaRz9HmvIe1i45joy8PAk=; b=RCXoXfUlle7x43i0levZX27hYrglsBYx7JnA/1imPQieSxNwyzs6WbFTRLDhjQ2JDi d/LYkXLBxtmYeEonpVOWmSMMTHTolEIy5bZex90D+fGkktQm82sqSP5oRb/hGvsI7PXH tnZAulfLKZitTx7pWDy49nsoaOlLCYHVFy/GU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K3F+Bj0dkmEpmPNqNVZMp1QSm93qaWjFIbEb87abAUQwd2p3GZTl82L+W5Fd9JSgGN 4mTBDT4AJBZ4isiLc7JVbNss4vC+0E5W8j4swddJ4w5+zOcEyIf7wSQJ7zmW4wSvIzID GWFO7vNF07tmaWEVczUstukd9makRAat4x9YE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.211.13 with SMTP id gm13mr4925016icb.249.1288453254196; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.38.207 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:40:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000e01cb7841$aa7dce50$ff796af0$@thetaphi.de> References: <000e01cb7841$aa7dce50$ff796af0$@thetaphi.de> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:40:54 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: inconsistency/performance trap of empty terms From: Earwin Burrfoot To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 18:49, Uwe Schindler wrote: > In my opinion, we should not have analyzers at all (just my personal opin= ion). "new Field(name, TokenStream)" is much enough from consistency standp= oint! Indeed, my friend! --=20 Kirill Zakharenko/=D0=9A=D0=B8=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BB =D0=97=D0=B0=D1=85= =D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BA=D0=BE (earwin@gmail.com) Phone: +7 (495) 683-567-4 ICQ: 104465785 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org