Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96517 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 18:22:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 18:22:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 35850 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 18:22:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 35800 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 18:22:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 35793 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 18:22:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:22:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:22:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SIMJR1011853 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:22:20 GMT Message-ID: <3316894.125191288290139080.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:22:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Martijn van Groningen (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-2205) Grouping performance improvements In-Reply-To: <261553.124741288287861564.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925899#action_12925899 ] Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2205: --------------------------------------------- bq. Are these a different set of optimizations than those already proposed: SOLR-2069, SOLR-2068, SOLR-2070, and the rather unspecific SOLR-2071? This patch is more a general improvement fix and I think wouldn't really fit in any of these issue. > Grouping performance improvements > --------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-2205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2205 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: search > Affects Versions: 4.0 > Reporter: Martijn van Groningen > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: SOLR-2205.patch > > > This issue is dedicated to the performance of the grouping functionality. > I've noticed that the code is not really performing on large indexes. Doing a search (q=*:*) with grouping on an index from around 5M documents took around one second on my local development machine. We had to support grouping on an index that holds around 50M documents per machine, so we made some changes and were able to happily serve that amount of documents. Patch will follow soon. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org