Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99396 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 13:02:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 13:02:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 76124 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 13:02:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75894 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 13:02:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75764 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 13:02:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:02:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:02:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9TD2ODi024361 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:02:24 GMT Message-ID: <26923578.140771288357344920.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:02:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2675) Add support for 3.0 indexes in 2.9 branch In-Reply-To: <21287339.429611285621896462.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926260#action_12926260 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2675: --------------------------------------- So as Robert seems to also agree, I think I commit this and modify changes.txt to explicitely say that thisonly applys to 2.9/3.0, as it uses same codebase and same bugfix level. > Add support for 3.0 indexes in 2.9 branch > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2675 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2675 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 2.9, 2.9.1, 2.9.2, 2.9.3 > Reporter: Uwe Schindler > Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.9.4 > > Attachments: index.30.cfs.zip, index.30.nocfs.zip, LUCENE-2675.patch > > > There was a lot of user requests to be able to read Lucene 3.0 indexes also with 2.9. This would make the migration easier. There is no problem in doing that, as the new stored fields version in Lucene 3.0 is only used to mark a segment's stored fields file as no longer containing compressed fields. But index format did not really change. This patch simply allows FieldsReader to pass a Lucene 3.0 version number, but still writes segments in 2.9 format (as you could suddenly turn on compression for added documents). > I added ZIP files for 3.0 indexes for TestBackwards. Without the patch it does not pass, as FieldsReader complains about incorrect version number (although it could read the file easily). If we would release maybe a 2.9.4 release of Lucene we should include that patch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org