lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: inconsistency/performance trap of empty terms
Date Fri, 29 Oct 2010 05:32:57 GMT
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Andi Vajda <vajda@osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I've used this in a URL index. I needed to be able to distinguish between
> searching URLs that had, say, no path, from searching URLs without matching
> the path component. The absence of path was represented with an empty token
> in the path field.
>

but you didn't really need to use the empty term... you could have
used something like U+001F INFORMATION SEPARATOR... and your whole
index would have been an entire byte bigger?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message