lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-2002) improve build/tests
Date Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:19:22 GMT


Andrzej Bialecki  commented on SOLR-2002:

bq. Does reload() imply build()? If so, it's a suggester problem, if not, it's a SpellCheckerListener
The problem is in Suggester, and it's related to a non-persistent implementation of Lookup
in Suggester, as opposed to a persistent spellchecking index. With spellchecker, when firstSearcher
event is processed we want to load an existing spellchecking index (that's why it doesn't
call build(), but reload()). On the other hand, if we want to rebuild the spellchecking index
on commit, and we process a newSearcher event, then we need to use build(), not reload().

So far the code was correct. However, current implementations of Lookup don't persist their
data, so it's lost after commit and it needs to be rebuilt both on firstSearcher and on newSearcher.
I created SOLR-2173 to track this issue.

> improve build/tests
> -------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-2002
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Build
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>         Attachments: SOLR-2002.junit.xml.formatter.patch, SOLR-2002.patch, SOLR-2002_buildfailed.patch,
SOLR-2002_core_contrib.patch, SOLR-2002_dih.patch, SOLR-2002_lbhttpsolrserver.patch, SOLR-2002_localization.patch,
SOLR-2002_lucenetestcase.patch, SOLR-2002_merged.patch, SOLR-2002_merged.patch, SOLR-2002_merged.patch,
SOLR-2002_merged.patch, SOLR-2002_replication.patch, SOLR-2002_testiter.patch, SOLR-2002_testmethod.patch,
SOLR-2002_timeout.patch, SOLR-2002setupteardown.patch, TEST-org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTest.txt
> we are working on improving some functionality in lucene's build/tests, it would be good
to improve the solr side to take advantage of it.
> currently its only sorta-kinda integrated and a bit messy.
> i'd like to do some incremental improvements piece-by-piece on this issue.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message