Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6802 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2010 01:23:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Sep 2010 01:23:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 56994 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2010 01:23:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56960 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2010 01:23:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56953 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2010 01:23:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:23:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:23:47 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so271643wwi.5 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:23:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=WWxAbH7WDC97NwNTTT7QTahhM+9XNn4tlKS3zJti4xM=; b=DBg4lRzsEtNCrrhMpa8XAKeeZNiQT5+czRWQ2Mx479AJd9LTMnKXB8vWfZHHl+Rr7t Bybbm+55Ydj34ejVK8jWI3CT35aSLDPFMYwRgrsp0tjU6ouGmJrfVRn0p/pF2XWP71RE NRjA092TdGUcsPHLkrgkYfx3ReYLfS73n0Gxs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=kPzVl8dMseCP0nswyco4xQZJJHDzXvMwj3rh4q0/H0Ohwrz3UbtbFOoqpIOxPhrGGK n5XyJqEEh9l2FAgLp1mV48KENHLk5V66BKwk/08GQTinnsCw05yYfyXlDtq/CM/2d7a2 Y/sqt2DzpXpjMQrtORZTxXsaxqKcMNOrA9FJw= Received: by 10.216.45.16 with SMTP id o16mr160814web.45.1284168192194; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:23:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.132.165 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:22:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Muir Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:22:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: exceptions from solr/contrib/dataimporthandler and solr/contrib/extraction To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367b6c30ed91a4048ff1b44c --0016367b6c30ed91a4048ff1b44c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello, today i fixed the build so the solr contrib tests run like solr core. Can someone review the exceptions now shown by these tests? contrib/extraction prints an 'unknown field a' exception, and the dataimporthandler prints various scary errors (but these look legit since they are coming from TestErrorHandling) I didnt want to add these to 'exceptionIgnores' in these tests without someone else taking a look, but if they are expected i think we should. -- Robert Muir rcmuir@gmail.com --0016367b6c30ed91a4048ff1b44c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, today i fixed the build so the solr contrib tests run like solr core= .

Can someone review the exceptions now shown by these t= ests?

contrib/extraction prints an 'unk= nown field a' exception, and the dataimporthandler prints various scary= errors (but these look legit since they are coming from TestErrorHandling)=

I didnt want to add these to 'exceptionIgnores'= in these tests without someone else taking a look, but if they are expecte= d i think we should.

--
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com
--0016367b6c30ed91a4048ff1b44c--