Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-55596-apmail-lucene-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28170 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2010 15:40:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2010 15:40:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 98221 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2010 15:40:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 97866 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2010 15:40:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 97850 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2010 15:40:53 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:40:53 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:40:46 +0000
Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so2364253ewy.35
        for <dev@lucene.apache.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=trHKS/2sJ+QAfBpAmPCPO48e0mRADlv8kSPXWaxPBX4=;
        b=mZSKRTP/0RXVX+/hgSA06bTfcwkKvQvrsaw9XsMbzuhlSkmvteImtMGgIvmupSN4am
         2cgUDRc7d0Pt6AOmU6KxcEU2o0JmLTVhNsofhLBJP051Sv0d86z/sfeHQ64xRIeQFUet
         SPoHub0Vz9nXyeCeoKuVhA6nuPQ1pHRfMWYTo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=wkV4uMrB2wKGbYTxV/SNEWj616HBha1nIXgLxtLGHlN3CgvvhjCr0904kJpZJ6SiMx
         79i5xgebgGyfPVA6B62/LJqBFZjdOHxO0MWfv1N2FqzRW3mLjtgsw5oNcglmUv+RiLyz
         npWK51gxFFFvfLKlzfIZbUDWNBH7rlhmTBFNk=
Received: by 10.216.178.200 with SMTP id f50mr1048365wem.62.1284133225165;
 Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.132.165 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:40:05 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinPxCywMnAnq0W4i7RcK0OMMzhPV3nEd=d4Eq1S@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: lia2 tests for branch_3x ?
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fabb1baf40d048fe99031

--0016367fabb1baf40d048fe99031
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

As i was merging some test changes, i noticed a test from the original
Lucene In Action...

I got to thinking, if we get whatever permission we need from manning, what
about importing the LIA2 tests into lucene's test system? They are marked
with an apache 2 license...

I think they are very nice and readable, and though you could say basic,
there are benefits to this:
* sometimes its good to have a readable test you can actually debug, you
cant have all hellacious random tests
* i think its useful to know if we make a change to branch_3x that breaks
one of these, like a basic sanity test for backwards compat.

any thoughts?

-- 
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com

--0016367fabb1baf40d048fe99031
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,<div><br></div><div>As i was merging some test changes, i noticed a test=
 from the original Lucene In Action...</div><div><br></div><div>I got to th=
inking, if we get whatever permission we need from manning, what about impo=
rting the LIA2 tests into lucene&#39;s test system? They are marked with an=
 apache 2 license...</div>

<div><br></div><div>I think they are very nice and readable, and though you=
 could say basic, there are benefits to this:</div><div>* sometimes its goo=
d to have a readable test you can actually debug, you cant have all hellaci=
ous random tests</div>

<div>* i think its useful to know if we make a change to branch_3x that bre=
aks one of these, like a basic sanity test for backwards compat.</div><div>=
<br></div><div>any thoughts?</div><div><br>-- <br>Robert Muir<br><a href=3D=
"mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com">rcmuir@gmail.com</a><br>


</div>

--0016367fabb1baf40d048fe99031--