Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryantxu@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Qr8KRInhFsK91rZ//Z8DZSZNpB6KcwHCQNWZ6Cv/lQvfS9MTS78DD2hxBFkNfN9ZqN
         x5Z8Oa3JMMsVWRzJUYp5qg+pKTHDu58dWGoYYZTKlyNN3DDPFyhjmqZmQrxKKG9mhncp
         rzNYp0ML2qAyWz++QW36cEny1YWrG//fDCCyM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikpw28v1bw=F=aNuHCMBPt3L9YULvZjXLAGdG0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTim7_atnJTW3pxt0+Z15BjsQ43ob-WG1tpr-YktB@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1009171822570.22231@radix.cryptio.net>
	<4C9427DC.1040003@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikpw28v1bw=F=aNuHCMBPt3L9YULvZjXLAGdG0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:02:50 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikC6gBHhXh5A5WeES3FYGBDmfs4JbhWv3rCTGtd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: discussion about release frequency.
From: Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I don't get what is being proposed...  are you guys really suggesting
we drop the ant generate-maven-artifacts target?  and let people who
use maven sort it out for themselves?  Making sure the generated poms
are valid is another question


On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Chris Male <gento0nz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>>
>> On 9/17/10 9:45 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>> =A0When we vote on a release, tha's what we
>> > are voting on: source. =A0We may also distribute precompiled binary ja=
rs
>> > via the download mirrors, or via maven, but that's not what the releas=
e
>> > is
>> > about -- so let's get hte pom template files out of hte src tree, let'=
s
>> > get the maven related tasks out of the build.xml file and treat
>> > publishing
>> > to maven as a seperate process that happens *after* the release. =A0We
>> > vote
>> > on the release, we release it, and then the folks that care about mave=
n
>> > can publish the jars after the fact.
>> >
>
> Given how messy and problem plagued the maven releases code is currently,=
 +1
> to this idea.
>
>
> --
> Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| www.jteam.nl
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org