Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58685 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2010 11:37:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2010 11:37:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 49628 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 11:37:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 49361 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 11:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 49351 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2010 11:37:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:37:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:37:09 +0000 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so844383fxm.35 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:36:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=0wm5abozhpQRPg1yP2aVkb0H6ADsHrhCcmNYJYG0k60=; b=KVz9KgAAD1Ag4g93lvRohItI82mxlNAcDMRRsjXL9P+au5TNg1d/d5yCmPlbSze/uZ K1oh0PcPXHnQMOLxEGM/OT6+VXNzO18r1R6GDEl54z3rYOt29j6fOlA4beMAmB/JHpPH X9MReA2auM4DtvdQqFRhWBy5cimuKpGenKGxo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=T7bjRa8D4nHbrUsvIh3oFLNpkWF7JYtw6W1Rc2hNnRHBT93dAWB2klCTBD3CwOiTiF aTi/KyFiel/YC0vR20jMUJ0qu2lniqSaibBfThN12yukFe8b8OR8U072Eswjb5xSTIQS k0GYSpGzIYCNxEYsqnCYlolj7vOlVsL0uudkg= Received: by 10.223.114.19 with SMTP id c19mr1144841faq.29.1284982608235; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:36:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.106.19 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:36:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Muir Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:36:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Failed Test: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriter (from TestSuite) To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b14d62e80c9d0490af534a --001636b14d62e80c9d0490af534a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Michael McCandless < lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hmm -- I suspect TestIndexWriter.testNoWaitClose hit an exc, which > caused it not to close the dir, but the code that catches this in > LuceneTestCase fails to show that root cause? > > I think we should disable the "dir/IndexInput/Output not closed" > checking if the test hit an exc? > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2656 -- Robert Muir rcmuir@gmail.com --001636b14d62e80c9d0490af534a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Michael= McCandless <lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
Hmm -- I suspect TestIndexWriter.testNoWaitClose hit an exc, which
caused it not to close the dir, but the code that catches this in
LuceneTestCase fails to show that root cause?

I think we should disable the "dir/IndexInput/Output not closed"<= br> checking if the test hit an exc?



--
Robert Muir
rcmuir@= gmail.com
--001636b14d62e80c9d0490af534a--