Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of goksron@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus
         :x-antivirus-status;
        b=bvisTFjGX0vPfZnrKGtVy2XiwJl2wvrNNLvCAkgYU2y591dxi8myAQiXqiriL3EYrF
         LQLzKTNQ4qE/HgvRE31ppWs3tFVSrujgtvAsu9cMnbDmcQSGLWf8JEAsJvWWM0rvyaKS
         L/dM+wJHtEwene41Lhc1j11hmWsSaYs6EvyP0=
Message-ID: <4C8D7664.3060606@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:55:00 -0700
From: Lance Norskog <goksron@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100825 SeaMonkey/2.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: exceptions from solr/contrib/dataimporthandler and
 solr/contrib/extraction
References: <AANLkTinmmxsYimW-V_Wg9pgC43wd4uGpKAYjn1-xnXMT@mail.gmail.com>
	<C487986B-DCA0-4E61-A47A-59A0B43C911C@apache.org>
 <AANLkTims6VYebqe+sTLq0famJAK=FBKPFrq4eZEmJNPm@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTims6VYebqe+sTLq0famJAK=FBKPFrq4eZEmJNPm@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

And this is why unit tests shouldn't spew- just yes or no, please. If 
you want to patch this, please comment out all the printed trash, since 
all it does is cause mail threads like this.

Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Grant Ingersoll<gsingers@apache.org>  wrote:
>    
>>> contrib/extraction prints an 'unknown field a' exception
>>>        
>> The printing of this could be commented out, possibly.  The exception being thrown is proper operation, as the field a does not exist.
>>      
> Yeah, but the bigger question is if  field "a" should have been
> generated given the specific extraction configuration.
> If it's explicitly testing for an exception, then we can ignore it
> (add it to the ignores list)... otherwise it's either a test bug or a
> solr-cell bug, right?
>
> -Yonik
> http://lucenerevolution.org  Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>    

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org