Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95347 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2010 15:55:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Sep 2010 15:55:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 52199 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 15:55:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 51846 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 15:55:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 51839 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2010 15:55:12 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:55:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:54:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8HFsX0c015225 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:54:33 GMT Message-ID: <21725828.252751284738873031.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:54:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2649) FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs In-Reply-To: <3738400.244411284693932822.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12910640#action_12910640 ] Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2649: --------------------------------------- oh right -- thats true. Is a global flag sufficient? In lucene it could default to false and in solr default to true. I know we don't want to just keep adding more things to memory, but I'm not sure there is a huge win by selectively enabling and disabling some fields. > FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2649 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ryan McKinley > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch > > > The FieldCache returns an array representing the values for each doc. However there is no way to know if the doc actually has a value. > This should be changed to return an object representing the values *and* a BitSet for all valid docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org