lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <>
Subject Re: discussion about release frequency.
Date Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:49:46 GMT
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Grant Ingersoll <>wrote:

> Why don't we just leave this as this:
> Those of us who want Maven supported as part of the release need to get our
> stuff together by the next release or else it will be dropped.  That means
> making sure the artifacts are correct and easily testable/reproducible.  If
> we can't do that, then I agree, it should be a downstream effort, at least
> until we all realize how many people actually use it and then we revisit it
> at the next release.
But I'm not sure this is the best solution? If we can push this downstream,
so that the release manager has less to worry about (even with testable
artifacts etc, the publication etc), why wouldn't we do that instead?

Robert Muir

View raw message