lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: discussion about release frequency.
Date Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:02:50 GMT
I don't get what is being proposed...  are you guys really suggesting
we drop the ant generate-maven-artifacts target?  and let people who
use maven sort it out for themselves?  Making sure the generated poms
are valid is another question




On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Chris Male <gento0nz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/17/10 9:45 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>  When we vote on a release, tha's what we
>> > are voting on: source.  We may also distribute precompiled binary jars
>> > via the download mirrors, or via maven, but that's not what the release
>> > is
>> > about -- so let's get hte pom template files out of hte src tree, let's
>> > get the maven related tasks out of the build.xml file and treat
>> > publishing
>> > to maven as a seperate process that happens *after* the release.  We
>> > vote
>> > on the release, we release it, and then the folks that care about maven
>> > can publish the jars after the fact.
>> >
>
> Given how messy and problem plagued the maven releases code is currently, +1
> to this idea.
>
>
> --
> Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| www.jteam.nl
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message