lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2640) add LuceneTestCase[J4].newField
Date Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:37:32 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12908371#action_12908371
] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2640:
---------------------------------------

In my opinion, TedstBackwardsCompatibility should not add random things in its document creation,
as the zip files should be reproducible. If there are any random parts in it from previous
parts, we should remove them.

I would revert the changes and any previous randomization in the parts that are respo nsible
for the zip file creation.

> add LuceneTestCase[J4].newField
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2640
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2640
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Tests
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2640.patch
>
>
> I think it would be good to vary the different field options in tests.
> For example, we do this with IW settings (newIndexWriterConfig), and directories (newDirectory).
> This patch adds newField(), it works just like new Field(), except it will sometimes
turns on extra options:
> Stored fields, term vectors, additional term vectors data, etc.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message