lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2665) Rework FieldCache to be more flexible/general
Date Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:35:32 GMT


Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2665:

bq. I'm reading Mikes list as stuff we should keep in mind as we start a new direction.

Exactly -- we certainly don't have to get this done on the first baby
step, but if we're gonna make big changes to FC now, we should have
this future target/issues-to-fix in mind.

In fact I'm fine w/ the original baby step of sticking the Bits config
onto Parser, as long as it doesn't use static config nor risk added

> Rework FieldCache to be more flexible/general
> ---------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2665
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2665-FieldCacheOverhaul.patch
> The existing FieldCache implementation is very rigid and does not allow much flexibility.
 In trying to implement simple features, it points to much larger structural problems.
> This patch aims to take a fresh approach to how we work with the FieldCache.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message