lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1900) move Solr to flex APIs
Date Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:16:21 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12909160#action_12909160
] 

Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-1900:
------------------------------------------

I think it makes sense to move append to BytesRef, though I wonder if it should it over-allocate
(ArrayUtil.oversize) when it grows?  I realize for the current calls to append we don't need
that (you just append bigTerm, once), but if someone uses this like a StringBuffer... though,
this isn't really the intention of BytesRef, so maybe it's OK to not oversize.

> move Solr to flex APIs
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1900
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-1900-facet_enum.patch, SOLR-1900-facet_enum.patch, SOLR-1900_bigTerm.txt,
SOLR-1900_FileFloatSource.patch, SOLR-1900_termsComponent.txt
>
>
> Solr should use flex APIs

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message