lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2662) BytesHash
Date Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:25:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12914478#action_12914478
] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2662:
------------------------------------------

> BytesRefHash is now final and does not create Entry objects anymore

That's good.

> move ByteBlockPool to o.a.l.utils

Sure why not.

> factoring it out of TermsHashPerField, the next question is are we gonna do that in a
different issue and get this committed first?

We need to factor it out of THPF otherwise this patch isn't really useful for committing.
 Also, it'll get tested through the entirety of the unit tests, ie, it'll get put through
the laundry.  

> BytesHash
> ---------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2662
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>    Affects Versions: Realtime Branch, 4.0
>            Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
>            Assignee: Simon Willnauer
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Realtime Branch, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2662.patch, LUCENE-2662.patch
>
>
> This issue will have the BytesHash separated out from LUCENE-2186

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message