lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2665) Rework FieldCache to be more flexible/general
Date Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:07:34 GMT


Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2665:

bq. In fact I'm +1 on switching Lucene's trunk to CTR model instead

We have always been CTR - but how fast we commit w/o feedback from others is a function of
our confidence level (i.e. how much we think people would agree/disagree with the change if
they did review it, taking in other things like the complexity / invasiveness of the change).

I'm not sure we should change the way we currently do things - trunk is developing plenty

> Rework FieldCache to be more flexible/general
> ---------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-2665
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2665-FieldCacheOverhaul.patch, LUCENE-2665-FieldCacheOverhaul.patch
> The existing FieldCache implementation is very rigid and does not allow much flexibility.
 In trying to implement simple features, it points to much larger structural problems.
> This patch aims to take a fresh approach to how we work with the FieldCache.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message