lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2628) Extract OpenBitSet to Apache Commons
Date Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:24:54 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903983#action_12903983
] 

Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2628:
-----------------------------------------

bq. I'm not sure I like this. Most of the stuff in the util package should be marked lucene.internal
anyway, so such a jar would be of minimal use.
You are probably right here and I did really expect that to be a serious option. I was just
curious if other would like that so we could discuss the pros and cons. I personally think
if it is only one class people should duplicate that code and try to keep in sync on their
own. Yet the whole code duplication discussion is a valid point but not worth the hassle here.


bq. Although some might consider utility stuff like this useful, I don't think we should be
creating artifacts that arent focused on search. 
we should keep this stuff internal.
I actually don't agree on that, if a nice stand alone jar comes out of what we do here we
should not hesitate to make it usable without the core but that might be a super rare case
and might even have never happened before here but generally being against such a thing doesn't
seem to be community or cross project friendly to me. I can understand the reasons why this
issue has been created and I support not to push stuff towards a third party dependency from
a lucene point of view (that is just not an option and should stay like that) but still we
can try working with others to use lucene code in a more convenient way, search related or
not.

> Extract OpenBitSet to Apache Commons
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2628
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2628
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Stu Hood
>
> o.a.l.util.OpenBitSet is a great alternative to java.util.BitSet, and it is generally
useful outside of the search field. It would be great if OpenBitSet were available outside
of Lucene proper, perhaps as part of Apache Commons.
> Aside from the communication required to accomplish this, there is the small issue of
OpenBitSet extending o.a.l.search.DocIdSet in Lucene 3.0. There is very little logic contained
in DocIdSet, so it could probably become an interface: Lucene proper could then extend the
extract version of OpenBitSet to implement DocIdSet.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message